Restituzione

The case concerned an action to recover possession of property which
had been confiscated from the Parish when the communist regime
was established in 1948. Prior to 1948 the Greek-Catholic
parishes had possessed a range of properties, lands and
buildings. The Uniate denomination was dissolved in 1948 and the
property of the Greek-Catholic Church was transferred to the
State, apart from parish property, which was transferred to the
Orthodox Church. The Uniate denomination was officially
recognised after the fall of the communist regime in December
1989. As regards the legal situation of the former property of the
Uniate parishes, a section of the Legislative Decree laid down
that it should be adjudicated by joint commissions
of representatives of the clergy of both denominations, and that
in reaching their decisions the commissions should take account
of “the wishes of the adherents of the communities to whom
the properties belong”. In the event of disagreement
between the clerical representatives, the party interested in
taking legal action could bring proceedings under ordinary domestic
law. Between 1998 and 2002 several unproductive meetings were
held by representatives of the Siseşti Parish Eastern-Rite
Catholic Church and Orthodox Church representatives. On 24 February
2004 the applicant’s action was initially dismissed under a
final judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice on the ground that
the commission had not yet assessed the legal situation of the
property in issue and that, moreover, part of that property came
under special legislation. In April 2005 the applicant parish
lodged a fresh claim with the Regional Court to recover possession of
the property, over which it claimed rightful ownership. That
Court dismissed that claim. The Court of Appeal referred the case
back. The court adjourned its examination of the case from 2 June 2008
to 27 February 2009 on the ground that an objection as regards
constitutionality had been transmitted to the Constitutional
Court. On 21 September 2011 the court ordered the restitution of the
church and the land at issue. The appeals lodged by both parties
were dismissed. By judgment of 21 November 2012 the High Court
upheld the decisions given. Relying in particular on Article 6
§ 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) the
applicant notably complained about the length of the proceedings
concerning their action to recover possession of their places of
worship. [Press Release]

Decreto 27 agosto 1998, n. 112: “Restoring of some real estates which belonged to the communities (organisations, religious cults) of national minorities from Romania”. Art. 1 The buildings and the land running with them included in the annex — which is integral part of the present government order — and which belonged to the communities […]

Sono riconducibili a rettorie in senso stretto, ai fini
dell’applicazione dell’art. 8 della legge 27 maggio 1929, n. 848 –
secondo cui i Comuni e le Province cui siano stati concessi i
fabbricati dei conventi soppressi sono tenuti a rilasciarne senza
indennità una congrua parte da destinarsi a rettoria della chiesa
annessa – non solo i locali adibiti ad ufficio amministrativo o ad
abitazione del clero o dei religiosi, ma anche quelli utilizzati per
le opere connesse al culto che nella chiesa si celebra.

Il rapporto intercorrente tra l’Opera Nazionale per il Mezzogiorno
d’Italia ed il Fondo edifici di culto ha natura privatistica e le
relative controversie (nella specie inerenti a restituzione di taluni
beni immobili) rientrano nell’ambito della giurisdizione ordinaria.

Legge 30 marzo 1998, n. 88: “Norme sulla circolazione dei beni culturali”. (da “Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana” n. 84 del 10 aprile 1998) (omissis) Art. 2. (Azione di restituzione) I beni culturali usciti illecitamente dal territorio di uno Stato membro dell’Unione europea dopo il 31 dicembre 1992 sono restituiti a norma delle disposizioni della […]